|
|
|
|
home
|
|
VERMEER VAN DELFT/ ARTISTS
1650-1899/ ART MAIN
|
film and food
|
|
Jan (b. 1632, Delft, d.
1675, Delft)
|
literature and
food
|
|
Dutch painter. Among the
great Dutch artists of the 17th century, he is now second in renown only
to Rembrandt, but he made little mark during his lifetime and then long
languished in obscurity. Almost all of the contemporary references to
him are in colourless official documents and his career is in many ways
enigmatic. Apart from a visit to The Hague in 1672 (to act as an expert
witness concerning a group of Italian paintings of disputed
authenticity), he is never known to have left his native Delft. He
entered the painters' guild there in 1653 and was twice elected hooftman
(headman), but his teacher is not known. His name is often linked with
that of Carel Fabritius, but it is doubtful if he can have formally
taught Vermeer, and this distinction may belong to Leonaert Bramer,
although there is no similarity between their work.
Only about thirty-five to
forty paintings by Vermeer are known, and although some early works may
have been destroyed in the disastrous Delft magazine explosion of 1654,
it is unlikely that the figure was ever much larger; this is because
most of the Vermeers mentioned in early sources can be identified with
surviving pictures, whilst only a few pictures now attributed to him are
not mentioned in these sources - thus there are few loose ends. This
small output may be at least partially explained by the fact that he
almost certainly earned most of his living by means other than painting.
His father kept an inn and was a picture-dealer and Vermeer very likely
inherited both businesses. In spite of this he had grave financial
troubles (he had a large family to support his wife bore him fifteen
children, and she was declared insolvent in the year after his death).
In the central part of
his career (into which most of his work falls) Vermeer painted those
serene and harmonious images of domestic life that for their beauty of
composition, handling, and treatment of light raise him into a different
class from any other Dutch genre painter. The majority show one or two
figures in a room lit from the onlooker's left, engaged in domestic or
recreational tasks. The predominant colours are yellow, blue, and grey,
and the compositions have an abstract simplicity which confers on them
an impact out of relation to their small size. In reproduction they can
look quite smooth and detailed, but Vermeer often applies the paint
broadly, with variations in texture suggesting the play of light with
exquisite vibrancy - the critic Jan Veth aptly described his paint
surface as looking like 'crushed pearls melted together'.
|
|
music
and food
|
|
photography and food |
|
L'Ambition de Vermeer -
amazon.fr
|
|
|
|
|
Das Mädchen mit dem Perlenohrring - amazon.de
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Milkmaid
c. 1658
Oil on canvas, 45,5 x 41 cm
Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam |
|
|
|
|
Signature: Not
signed.
Provenance: This
picture ranges among the most highly appreciated paintings by Vermeer,
since shortly after his demise and also in subsequent years, second only
to his View of Delft. It also fetched the second highest price in the
Amsterdam sale of 1696, no. 2: "A maid pouring out milk, extremely well
done, by ditto, fl 175." The price is reasonable, given the mediocre
level at which his paintings traded. The work never left Holland, and
its attribution to Vermeer was upheld throughout. Slankert enumerates
various Amsterdam sales in which the Milkmaid is mentioned and highly
spoken of, until the canvas became part of the Six collection,
Amsterdam, in the earlier part of the nineteenth century. It was
acquired by the museum in 1907-8 from this source.
Although the genre of
"kitchen pieces" belongs to a long tradition in the Netherlands, with
Joachim Beuckelaer and Pieter Aertsen in the sixteenth century being its
initiators, it lost favour in the subsequent century, with the exception
of Delft, where it endured. Vermeer's realization, however, has nothing
in common with his archaic forerunners. His vision is concentrated on a
single sturdy figure, which he executes in a robust technique, in
keeping with the image that he wants to project. The palette features a
subdued colour scheme: white, yellow, and blue. But the colours are far
from frank or strident, and are rather toned down, in keeping with the
worn work clothes of his model.
The still life in the
foreground conveys domestic simplicity, and the light falling in from
the left illuminates a bare white kitchen wall, against which the
silhouette of the maid stands out. One gains from this deceptively
simple scene an impression of inner strength, exclusive concentration on
the task at hand, and complete absorption in it. The extensive use of
pointillé in the still life lets us presume the use of the inverted
telescope in an effort to set off this part of the painting against the
main figure and alert the viewer to the contrast between the active
humanity of the maid and her inanimate environment. |
|
|
|